HMMM.....

A friend recently pointed out to me that women are undervaues and underpaid. I told her about my last post.
She told me it's still a mans wrld because men still run it, and if Hilary Clinton had come out and said ll the suf her husbnd did were her idea she would have been tossed out.

But that made me wonder: Is it true? Did no want her to be the first womn president because of her policies? If that's the case then she was just as unlikely to be electd as a man. I, for one, am sure I would not have liked her any more if she were a man. I actually don't like her at all.

Are women really undervalued, or are they just told they are? I for one feel undervalued because I stay at home for my child, s well as for my nieces to have safe child care. Does that mean i'm worth less? She hasn' t said as much, but I am sure one sister looks down on me for it. Either because she's jealous or because she really thinks less of me for it.
Is the work I do around a home less importnt than what Iwould do at a job outside the home?

What is the real driving fore behind this femanist movement to keep women out of the home? Why shouldn't we be in the home? We have a right to stay in the home and do what we re programed to do. Why is it looked at as wrong?

If my previous post seems angry I apologize. The news coverage really did tick me off.